You’re better at death than I, at about 16 I was given a chicken and a machete, all was going well until I peered into that singular eye... never look in the eyes. But, as in all things, memento mori.
if the moral rationale here is ‘death is a part of life’, then can’t we regard the murder of human-animals as merely expediting the inevitable, and therefore morally permissible? and if the ‘stoic’, might is right quip is valid, does that not justify the subjugation of any people group or person in history because they were outsmarted?
You’re better at death than I, at about 16 I was given a chicken and a machete, all was going well until I peered into that singular eye... never look in the eyes. But, as in all things, memento mori.
if the moral rationale here is ‘death is a part of life’, then can’t we regard the murder of human-animals as merely expediting the inevitable, and therefore morally permissible? and if the ‘stoic’, might is right quip is valid, does that not justify the subjugation of any people group or person in history because they were outsmarted?